Private beta · 96 Indian firms · 365M-document corpus

The agentic
legal operating system
for India.

The agentic operating system for Indian law. Built for the partners, counsel and in-house teams running matters across the Supreme Court, the twenty-five High Courts and the tribunals.

The agentic operating system for Indian law — seven layers.

Platform · seven layers
01Large Language Models

Claude, Gemini, and India-tuned models picked per task and routed by the harness. Twelve scheduled languages handled natively — not translated.

12 LANGUAGESMODEL-AGNOSTICPER-TASK ROUTING
02Agentic Harness

The engine that turns general-purpose models into legal-specific agents. Deterministic playbooks compose research, draft, review, file, eSign and audit.

DETERMINISTICTOOLS, NOT CHATTERAUDIT-LOGGED
03Data & Integrations

Supreme Court, twenty-five High Courts, every tribunal, every regulator. Indexed from primary sources — gazettes, court portals, regulator feeds — synced within twelve seconds.

27 CONNECTORS12s SYNCPRIMARY SOURCES
04Context & Knowledge

Playbooks, precedents, clause libraries, and matter history, layered into every agent action. Lawyers get the firm's collective experience on tap.

PLAYBOOKSPRECEDENTSMATTER HISTORY
05Legal Capabilities

Structured citations, court-format parsing, statute-aware retrieval, and tabular review at scale. The domain intelligence — not generic AI dressed up.

CITEDSTATUTE-AWARE≤ 90s / DOC
06Products & Interfaces

Assistant, GothamLaw, Matters, Tabular Review, Workflows, Playbooks, Court Formats, Stamp Duty, eSign — composed so a matter moves through without leaving the system.

ASSISTANTTABULAR REVIEWCOURT FORMATS
07Security & Governance

SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, DPDP Act 2023, in-region data residency. Ethical walls, per-matter ACLs, audit trails — built into every layer, not bolted on.

SOC 2ISO 27001DPDP 2023IN-REGION
Large Language Models
Reasoning · India-tuned
Agentic Harness
Orchestration
Data & Integrations
365M documents
Context & Knowledge
Firm memory
Legal Capabilities
Authority-grade
Products & Interfaces
Nine surfaces
Security & Governance
Enterprise-ready
Scroll to assemble the stack
Compliant with the standards Indian enterprises and GCs already require
§ SOC 2 Type II§ ISO 27001§ DPDP Act 2023§ Aadhaar eSign · NSDL§ In-region data residency
Trusted by 96 firms across litigation, M&A, tax, banking and in-house
From Tier-1 to single-counsel chambers.
Tier-1 · MumbaiPARTNER · 14 SEATS
Tier-1 · DelhiPARTNER · 22 SEATS
Tier-1 · BangalorePARTNER · 31 SEATS
Tier-1 · MumbaiPILOT
Tier-1 · DelhiPILOT
Boutique · MumbaiPILOT
Mid-tier · MumbaiPARTNER
Mid-tier · DelhiPARTNER
Mid-tier · BangalorePARTNER
Boutique · DelhiPILOT
Chambers · SCPILOT
+ 84 firmsWAITLIST
01  /  The workbench

An editorial surface for the work that gets done.

One workbench for the work the firm actually does: research a question, draft the response, review the document, execute the matter. The corpus reads court websites, gazettes and regulator feeds — and stays current within twelve seconds.

app.trygotham.io / law·● live
§ GOTHAM
Work
Assistant
GothamLaw
Projects
Matters
Chronologies
Review & Draft
Tabular Review
Workflows
Playbooks
Court Formats
Execute
Stamp Duty
eSign
Intake
§ GothamLaw
Search statutes, case law, and citations…/
◐ IN India +1
SYNCED · 12s AGO

Indian case law, statutes,
and regulatory motion.

Statutes 146K
Cases 365M
Supreme Court
156,550
100% · synced 12s ago
High Courts (25)
30M
every HC · bench-tagged
District (~700)
334M
eCourts · every taluka
Statutory + Reg.
146K
acts · rules · circulars
What changed today
1 AMENDMENT · LAST 24H · ACROSS ALL MATTERS
AMENDMENT
Amendment to uksi-2026-501
uksi-2026-501 · IT ACT §66A · cited in 3 matters
01 JUN 2026
Co-pilot
READING THE CORPUS
Ask anything of the Indian corpus…
⌬ Private mode
SUGGESTED
What changed in IT Act §66A this quarter?
Cases where SAT remitted SEBI orders since 2020
Compare arbitration seat tests: BALCO vs. NAFED
Today's brief
SUN · 24 MAY
AMENDMENT
01 JUN 2026
Amendment to uksi-2026-501
uksi-2026-501
DismissPull into Matter ↩
Cited
Every claim footnoted to a primary source — never a third-party scrape.
Private
Matters stay in your tenant. Not trained on. Audit-logged, end-to-end.
Local
In-region data residency. Compliant with the DPDP Act, 2023, end-to-end.
Composable
Agents call tools, not the other way around. Workflows are deterministic.
02  /  By practice

Five practices. One platform.

Gotham is the workbench for the firm — but the work happens inside a practice. Each practice gets tuned playbooks, court formats, and a curated slice of the corpus.

01
Litigation
  • Pleadings & rejoinders
  • Cause-list briefing
  • Cross-examination prep
  • Citation verification
02
Corporate & M&A
  • Data-room diligence
  • SPA / SHA term-checks
  • Closing checklists
  • Resolutions & filings
03
Tax
  • ITAT briefs & appeals
  • Section-wise research
  • TP documentation
  • GST advisory
04
Regulatory
  • SEBI · RBI · IRDAI
  • CCI filings
  • Sectoral compliance
  • Order tracking
05
In-house
  • Contract intake
  • Vendor & NDA review
  • Matter management
  • Outside-counsel routing
03  /  Modules

Nine surfaces. One operating system.

Gotham is not a chatbot bolted to a database. It is the workbench, the corpus, and the execution layer — composed so a matter moves through them without leaving the system.

Assistant
A counsel-grade assistant trained on Indian procedure. Drafts, reasons through facts, and cites the corpus inline.
For everyone12 tools
GothamLaw
The corpus, made workable. Search the entire Indian record by holding, citation, statute, bench, outcome.
Corpus49,033 cases
Matters
Files become matters. Pleadings, evidence, chronologies and orders, organised by court and party.
WorkspacesPer-matter ACLs
Tabular Review
Hundreds of contracts in a sheet. Columns are clauses; cells are extracted, cited, and verifiable.
Diligence≤ 90s / doc
Workflows
Compose agents into deterministic playbooks. Intake → research → draft → review → file → eSign.
Automation27 connectors
Playbooks
Your firm’s precedents and standards, turned into reusable agentic procedures the team can run.
StandardsFirm-tuned
Court Formats
Output that matches the court’s template: pagination, fonts, numbering, vakalatnamas, indexing.
Print-readySC · HCs · NCLT
Stamp Duty
State-wise calculation, e-stamping, and receipts — built in. Reconciled into the matter ledger.
Execute28 states
eSign
Aadhaar eSign and DSC, audit-trailed and timestamped. Routed by the workflow, not by email.
ExecuteeMudhra · NSDL
04  /  Agentic by design

A matter, end-to-end, in one session.

The same six steps a junior would do — except they happen in one continuous, auditable session. Every step has a reviewable surface; every citation is anchored; a human signs off where it matters.

01
Read the brief
Ingest pleadings, exhibits, prior orders. Extract parties, prayers, dates, statutory hooks.
02
Search the corpus
Pull binding authority and persuasive value. Rank by bench, recency, and citation strength.
03
Reason and propose
Construct the argument with explicit citations. Flag adverse authority before counsel does.
04
Draft in court format
Output that matches the court’s template — paragraph numbering, indexing, vakalatnama, fonts.
05
Review with the human
Junior counsel reviews. Senior partner approves. Edits round-trip back into the playbook.
06
Execute and file
Stamp, eSign, file, serve. The matter ledger and chronology update themselves.
matter · M-2026-0214 · Singtel v. ACIT
step 02 of 06
Corpus search results
14 BINDING · 27 PERSUASIVE
Top citations · ranked by bench & on-point score
Kilasho Trading v. ACIT
ITAT DEL · 2020 · 98% on-point
BINDING
Maruti Suzuki v. CIT
SC · 2019 · 86% on-point
BINDING
CIT v. Jai Prakash Singh
SC · 1996 · adverse · distinguishable
ADVERSE
Sahara India v. CIT
SC · 2008 · 64% on-point
BINDING
From 6,259 indexed cases● VERIFIED CITATIONS
This is one workflow — an ITAT appeal. Gotham ships ready-made workflows for litigation, diligence, regulatory and in-house intake — and lets your firm encode its own playbooks on top.
See all workflows
SUPREME COURTState of M.P. v. Suresh — appeal allowed·
AMENDMENTuksi-2026-501 · IT Act §66A·
SEBICircular SEBI/HO/IMD/2026/89 — REIT disclosure·
NCLT MUMBAIJet Airways resolution plan · order issued·
BOMBAY HCPIL 1124/2026 — environmental clearance set aside·
RBIMaster Direction 14/2026 — KYC update·
DELHI HCWP(C) 8821/2026 — interim injunction·
ITAT DELHIITA 2001/DEL/2022 — assessment quashed·
MCACSR-2 filing window opens 01 Jul·
COMPETITION COMMISSIONCase 14/2026 — informant notice·
SUPREME COURTState of M.P. v. Suresh — appeal allowed·
AMENDMENTuksi-2026-501 · IT Act §66A·
SEBICircular SEBI/HO/IMD/2026/89 — REIT disclosure·
NCLT MUMBAIJet Airways resolution plan · order issued·
BOMBAY HCPIL 1124/2026 — environmental clearance set aside·
RBIMaster Direction 14/2026 — KYC update·
DELHI HCWP(C) 8821/2026 — interim injunction·
ITAT DELHIITA 2001/DEL/2022 — assessment quashed·
MCACSR-2 filing window opens 01 Jul·
COMPETITION COMMISSIONCase 14/2026 — informant notice·
05  /  The Indian corpus

Three hundred sixty-five million documents. One workbench.

Constitution, statutes, rules, regulator circulars, Supreme Court judgments, all 25 High Courts, every tribunal, and the eCourts record of ∼700 district and taluka courts. Indexed from primary sources — official portals, the Gazette, regulator websites. Nothing rests on a third-party scrape.

STATUTORY + REGULATORY
146K
· Constitution · 400 central acts · 3,500 rules · SEBI · RBI · CBDT · CBIC · MCA + 14 regulators
SUPREME COURT + TRIBUNALS
1.1M
● SCI 156,550 · NCLT · NCLAT · ITAT · CESTAT · NCDRC · DRT
HIGH COURTS (25)
30M
Bombay · Delhi · Madras · Calcutta · Allahabad + 20 others, bench-tagged
DISTRICT COURTS (∼700)
334M
eCourts · every district + taluka + munsif court across India
Supreme Court of India
main.sci.gov.in · 156,550
High Court e-Records (25)
ecourts.gov.in · 30M
eCourts · District + taluka
districts.ecourts.gov.in · 334M
India Code · Central Acts
indiacode.nic.in · 400 acts
The Gazette of India
egazette.nic.in · daily
SEBI orders & circulars
sebi.gov.in · 7,200
RBI master directions
rbi.org.in · 12,200
MCA orders
mca.gov.in · 5,000
CBDT · Income Tax
incometaxindia.gov.in · 25,000
CBIC · GST + Customs
cbic.gov.in · 30,000
NCLT · NCLAT · ITAT · CESTAT
4 tribunals · 658,000
NCDRC · DRT · DRAT · NGT
4 tribunals · 302,000
06  /  In any language of the bench

Argue in English.
Brief in हिन्दी. Read causelists in मराठी.

Indian law is filed in twenty-two scripts. Our corpus is indexed in the language the bench wrote it in — so you can search a Marathi causelist, ask in Tamil, draft in Hindi, and have every response anchored to the same primary record.

SAME QUERY · FOUR LANGUAGES · 24 MAY 2026
“What changed in IT Act §66A this quarter, and what is the current Supreme Court view?”
ANCHORED
AIR 2015 SC 1523
EN · INEnglish

The Supreme Court reaffirmed the §66A regime in Shreya Singhal (2015); the recent amendment introduces a narrower offence-trigger that the Court has not yet revisited.

Cited — Shreya Singhal v. Union of India · AIR 2015 SC 1523
HIहिन्दी

उच्चतम न्यायालय ने श्रेया सिंघल (2015) में §66A व्यवस्था की पुष्टि की; नवीनतम संशोधन एक संकीर्ण अपराध-कारक प्रस्तुत करता है, जिस पर न्यायालय ने अभी पुनर्विचार नहीं किया है।

उद्धृत — श्रेया सिंघल बनाम भारत संघ · AIR 2015 SC 1523
TAதமிழ்

உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் §66A ஆட்சியை ஷ்ரேயா சிங்கல் (2015) வழக்கில் உறுதிப்படுத்தியது; சமீபத்திய திருத்தம் ஒரு குறுகிய குற்ற-தூண்டியை அறிமுகப்படுத்துகிறது, இதை நீதிமன்றம் இதுவரை மறுபரிசீலனை செய்யவில்லை.

மேற்கோள் — ஷ்ரேயா சிங்கல் வ. யூனியன் · AIR 2015 SC 1523
BNবাংলা

সুপ্রিম কোর্ট শ্রেয়া সিংঘল (২০১৫) মামলায় §66A ব্যবস্থা পুনর্নিশ্চিত করেছে; সাম্প্রতিক সংশোধনী একটি সংকীর্ণ অপরাধ-নির্ধারক উপস্থাপন করেছে, যা আদালত এখনো পুনর্বিবেচনা করেনি।

উদ্ধৃত — শ্রেয়া সিংঘল বনাম ভারত · AIR 2015 SC 1523
SAME PRIMARY SOURCE · FOUR SCRIPTS · ZERO TRANSLATION DRIFT AUDIT-LOGGED · MATTER M-2026-0214
Supported · all 22 scheduled languages + EnglishRead filings. Ask questions. Draft replies.
EnglishEN-INहिन्दीHIবাংলাBNతెలుగుTEमराठीMRதமிழ்TAગુજરાતીGUاردوURಕನ್ನಡKNଓଡ଼ିଆORമലയാളംMLਪੰਜਾਬੀPAঅসমীয়াASकॉशुरKSकोंकणीKOKमैथिलीMAIसंस्कृतSAनेपालीNEसिन्धीSDडोगरीDOIबड़ोBRXমৈতৈলোন্MNIसंथालीSAT
07  /  India first. Then the world.

Built where the work is hardest.

Indian law is a stress test for a legal OS. Five court tiers, twenty-two scheduled languages, twenty-eight stamp regimes, a corpus that moves daily. If a system can run a matter from intake to filing in this jurisdiction — across the Supreme Court, twenty-five High Courts, tribunals, and a dozen regulators — it can run one anywhere.

Gotham is built with Indian counsel and hosted in-region. Once it works for the Indian record, the same workbench unfolds — corpus by corpus, court format by court format — onto Singapore, the UK, the EU and the United States.

IN
India
Supreme Court · all 25 High Courts · SEBI · RBI · MCA · NCLT · NCLAT · ITAT · CCI
LIVE
SG
Singapore
SAL · Supreme Court of Singapore · MAS
Q3 2026
UK
United Kingdom
Bailii · Companies House · FCA
Q4 2026
EU
European Union
EUR-Lex · Curia · ESMA
H1 2027
US
United States
PACER · EDGAR · state codes
H2 2027
08  /  Counsel using Gotham

Drafted, reviewed, filed.

“The first day we ran Tabular Review on a 600-page diligence pack, it gave us back a Thursday. We have not gone back to manual since.”
— Senior Partner, M&A practiceTier-1 firm · Mumbai · 320 lawyers · 12-month deployment
Our juniors brief better with Gotham than without. Every cite is a primary source — no hallucinations, no surprises in court.
Counsel · Litigation chambersVerified deployment
For an in-house team of nine handling four hundred matters, the workflow layer is not a luxury. It is the only way the work scales.
General Counsel · Listed BSEVerified deployment
The corpus updates faster than the court website's own search does. That alone justified the seat.
Partner · Tax practiceVerified deployment
09  /  Pricing

Three ways in. One conversation.

Pricing is bespoke to firm size, practice mix and deployment shape. Tell us about the work; we'll come back with a plan that fits.

Counsel

Talk to us
A research-and-drafting partner that reads the corpus, cites it back to the paragraph, and writes the first draft for you.
  • Agentic research across SC, 25 HCs, NCLT, ITAT — every cite verified against the primary source
  • Drafts pleadings, replies, written submissions from your facts and matter file
  • Reads opposing-party documents and surfaces the weak points
  • Court-format compliant filings · SC, HCs, NCLT
  • 5 active matters · email support
Talk to us

Enterprise

Talk to us
The full agent stack on your tenant — your data residency, your procurement terms.
  • Dedicated in-region tenant — your matter data never leaves the boundary you choose
  • Custom playbooks and precedents trained on your firm's body of work
  • Bespoke agents for in-house workflows — contract triage, regulatory scanning, board packs
  • VPC peering · SCIM · SLA · DPA · MSA
  • Named solutions engineer
Talk to us
10  /  Common questions

Answered, in plain English.

If we haven't covered it, write to counsel@trygotham.io and we'll reply within a day.

Is my matter data ever used to train models?+
No. Matters stay inside your tenant, are encrypted at rest with per-tenant keys, and are never used to train base models or any model we run for other customers. Your tenant is the only place your work lives.
Where is data hosted, and how do you handle the DPDP Act, 2023?+
In-region by default — your matter data never leaves India. We act as a Data Processor under the DPDP Act. DPAs, SCCs and a full subprocessor list are available before contract; data residency is contractual.
How do you guarantee citations are real?+
Every claim the agent surfaces is anchored to a primary source we have indexed ourselves. The corpus is sourced from official portals — eCourts, India Code, the Gazette, regulator websites. We do not cite to scrapes or third-party aggregators.
Can Gotham file with courts directly?+
Through accredited filing connectors and partner counsel, yes — Supreme Court, the e-filing High Courts, NCLT, NCLAT and ITAT today. We also output print-ready court formats for benches that still file in physical.
What does onboarding look like for a 200-lawyer firm?+
A four-week deployment: week one is SSO, data residency and matter import; week two is playbook capture with your partners; week three is per-practice tuning; week four is firmwide rollout with a named solutions engineer.
How is this different from Harvey or Legora?+
Harvey and Legora are formidable platforms built primarily for US and European corpora and court systems. Gotham is built for the Indian record — every High Court, every tribunal, twenty-eight stamp regimes, vernacular causelists, Aadhaar eSign — first. Then the world.
Private beta · 96 firms onboarded

See Indian law,
end to end, in a live demo.

Watch the harness run a real matter — research, drafting, citations, filing format — on the corpus your firm already cares about.

REQUEST ACCESS